The System Of Indirect Rule In Western Nigeria

Northern Nigeria: Success Of Indirect Rule

Establishment and Exploitation:

After the establishment of the Nigerian state by 1900 and subsequent Amalgamation by 1914, classical Lugardian indirect rule mainly focused on economic exploitation.

 

Factors for Success:

1. Limited Powers of Obas:

In the Western region, the success of indirect rule partially stemmed from the limited powers of kings who were bound by the unwritten constitution of the kingdom. For instance, the case of pan Oyo Alaafin exemplifies this.

 

2. Impact of Education:

Educated elites questioned the rationale behind indirect rule, leveraging their education to challenge imperial imposition.

 

3. Religious Dynamics:

The majority of Yorubas being Christians, with a less conservative Christianity compared to Northern Islam, led to questions regarding the necessity of indirect rule.

 

4. Decentralized Administration:

Unlike the centralized system in the North, the Yoruba lacked a highly centralized administration, posing challenges to the implementation of indirect rule.

 

5. Taxation System:

The absence of a well-organized taxation system hindered the administration’s ability to raise funds, leading to riots in places like Iseyin, Okeho, and Abeokuta.

 

6. Neglect of Educated Elites:

Exclusion of educated elites from the administration resulted in open revolt against British hegemonic interests.

 

Eastern Nigeria: Failure Of Indirect Rule

 

Challenges and Failures:

1. Absence of Traditional Rulers:

The absence of chiefs rendered the system impracticable, as indirect rule relied on intermediary figures.

 

2. Appointment of Warrant Chiefs:

The imposition of pseudo-chiefs (warrant chiefs) by British officials for tax collection led to discontent, culminating in the Aba Women’s Riot of 1929.

 

3. Political Administration:

The decentralized nature of the Igbo political system clashed with the centralized approach of indirect rule, contributing to its failure.

 

4. Taxation Issues:

A lack of a well-organized taxation system undermined the financial sustainability of indirect rule, leading to its collapse.

 

5. Religious Dynamics:

Predominantly Christian Ibos questioned the imposition of indirect rule, given Christianity’s less conservative nature.

 

6. Alienation of Educated Elites:

Preference for uneducated individuals as warrant chiefs marginalized educated elites, sparking criticism.

 

Merits And Demerits Of Indirect Rule

Merits:

1. Less expensive system utilizing traditional rulers.
2. Preservation of existing traditions and cultures.
3. Training of traditional rulers in modern local government administration.

 

Demerits:

1. Alienation of educated elites.
2. Autocratic tendencies among traditional rulers.
3. Division between traditional rulers and educated elites, undermining unity.

 

Colonial Rule In West Africa: Impacts

 

Positive Impacts:

1. Introduction of modern government ideas.
2. Development of civil service and political parties.
3. Establishment of currency, banks, and exposure to Western education.

 

Negative Impacts:

1. Economic dependence and exploitation.
2. Polarization of English and French-speaking countries.
3. Cultural imperialism and the imposition of foreign cultures.
4. Facilitation of the slave trade and depletion of able-bodied individuals.
5. Lack of industrial development hindering overall progress.

Related Posts:

Colonial Administration (Historical Background)

Types And Characteristics Of Government

Political Socialization

Basic Concepts in Government 6

Basic Concepts in Government 5