Indirect Rule | Features, Reasons, Northern Nigeria, Western Nigeria, Eastern Nigeria

Indirect rule is characterized by the British governing their colonies through the utilization of local chiefs, intermediaries, and adherence to traditional laws and customs, while British officials oversee administration. Sir Lord Frederick Luggard, considered the ‘father of indirect rule,’ introduced this system in Nigeria, citing it as a necessity.   Features of Indirect Rule: Utilization […]

Indirect rule is characterized by the British governing their colonies through the utilization of local chiefs, intermediaries, and adherence to traditional laws and customs, while British officials oversee administration. Sir Lord Frederick Luggard, considered the ‘father of indirect rule,’ introduced this system in Nigeria, citing it as a necessity.

 

Features of Indirect Rule:

  1. Utilization of existing traditional administrative systems.
  2. Recognition of the status of traditional rulers.
  3. Implementation of traditional laws and customs.
  4. Supervision by British officials.
  5. Cost-effectiveness in administration.
  6. Collection of taxes.
  7. Use of native courts for justice.
  8. Deployment of native police and prisons.

 

Reasons for the Introduction of Indirect Rule:

  1. Scarcity of personnel due to the harsh conditions in West Africa.
  2. Limited funding from Britain.
  3. Success in other regions like India and Uganda, leading to the belief it could work in Nigeria.
  4. Economic efficiency by saving costs for maintaining officials.
  5. Preservation of existing traditions.
  6. Challenges posed by vast areas, language barriers, poor transportation, and communication.

 

Indirect Rule in Northern Nigeria:

  1. Comprising the centralized Sokoto Caliphate, Borno Empire, and smaller pagan areas.
  2. Successful due to preservation of culture, centralized power, illiteracy, religious beliefs, existing tax system, and promotion of traditional rulers.

 

Indirect Rule in Western Nigeria:

  1. Utilized Obas but faced challenges.
  2. Limited powers of Obas, educated population, diverse religions, absence of centralized administration, elite boycott, and attempts to restore authority to Alafin of Oyo.

 

Indirect Rule in Eastern Nigeria:

  1. Failed due to absence of traditional rulers, appointment of rejected warrant chiefs, decentralized political system, absence of taxation, religious differences, educated population protest, and boycott by elites.

 

Merits of Indirect Rule:

  1. Cost-effectiveness.
  2. Preservation of native laws and cultures.
  3. Development of political activities.
  4. Reduced administrative costs.
  5. Facilitated tax collection.
  6. Trained traditional rulers.
  7. Curbed some harmful practices introduced by Europeans.

 

Demerits of Indirect Rule:

  1. Native rulers as puppets of British officers.
  2. Alienation of educated elites.
  3. Inability to prosecute traditional rulers for misconduct.
  4. Bribery and corruption due to poor conditions of service.
  5. Abuse of democratic rights.
  6. Encouragement of tribalism and sectionalism.
  7. Viewed as an imposition.

Related Posts:

Colonial Administration | Meaning, Background, Reasons, Features & Classification

Pre-Colonial Administration or Political System | Hausa, Igbo & Yoruba, Nigeria

Local Government

Public Corporation | Meaning, Features, Organizational Structure & Control Mechanisms

Public Administration | Civil Service, Meaning, Characteristics, Structure, Functions, Problems

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top